logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2019.08.14 2019고단595
공무집행방해등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On November 25, 2018, from around 00:22 to 00:35 on the same day, the Defendant, at the front parking lot of the C apartment building D, located in Seopo-si B, who was arrested as a flagrant offender at around 00:35 on the same day on the same day as indicated in the charges of dismissing the prosecution as indicated in the following facts charged, refused to board the patrol vehicle, and thereafter, obstructed the police officer, who is the police officer of the Seopopo-gu Police Station Ecombbbbbbbbs, to walk the left side of the F, which belongs to the police officer of the Seopo-gu Police Station Ecom box, and committed assault, such as, again, taking the f of the said vehicle over three times in the course of getting on the patrol vehicle and getting off from the patrol vehicle.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order are as follows: (a) the Defendant recognized and reflects his mistake; (b) the primary offender; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, means and consequence of the crime; and (d) all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments, including the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.

Public Prosecution Rejection Parts

1. On November 25, 2018, from around 00:22 to around 00:35 on the same day, the Defendant was asked the victim F (47 years of age, developments), the victim G (age 31 years, and patrolmen) who is the police officer belonging to the Seopopo Police Station Estation called up after having received 112 reports at the parking lot front of the C apartment unit Ddong in Seopo-si B from around 00:0 to around 00:35 on November 25, 2018, and asked questions about what the Defendant wants to handle from the victim F (the police officer belonging to the Seopo Police Station Estation), who is the police officer belonging to the Seopo Police Station, who was called up at the scene. The Defendant argued that the above police officer delayed called out, and asked four fire officers, such as H, who were dispatched to the scene

arrow