본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.06.25 2013고단4686

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.


Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the president of the apartment house resident representative, and the victim D are the persons who represent the Dong.

On November 20, 2012, the Defendant, around 23:40 on November 20, 2012, assaulted the victim’s life expectancy on one occasion on the ground that the apartment house 1 Dong and six apartment complexes located in the apartment complex in Gwangju North-gu, Gwangju, is in bad credit standing, and slandered against the apartment residents, and inflicted an injury on the victim’s chest aggregate that requires four weeks of the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of witness D and E;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on medical records and medical record cards;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: Reasons for sentencing [Scope of Recommendation] general injury [No person who has been sentenced to a fine of KRW 200,00,000] shall be sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for 6 months and 2 years of suspended sentence: The following major circumstances are considered: (a) the motive, background, means and methods of the instant crime; (b) the circumstances before and after the instant crime; and (c) the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, career, environment, etc. as shown in the instant argument; (d) the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 50,000 as a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act on around 198; (e) the Defendant was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2,00,000 for violating the Clean Air Conservation Act on around 205; and (e) the victim was paid KRW 300,000 from the Defendant through F after the accident; and (e) the victim appears to have made efforts to reach an agreement with the victim of the above accident.