A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 600,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On December 25, 2016, 01:15 on December 25, 2016, the Defendant, within the “D convenience store” located in Seojin-gu Seoul, Seojin-gu, Seoul, without any grounds, did not steals an object to the E, while under the influence of alcohol.

‘Chacks', and allow the above E to do an unobligatory act, such as releasing the belongings, etc., and in around 01:21 on the same day, the same shall apply where the person who is the head of a division steals the thing.

‘A false report' was made in 112.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. E statements;

1. The defendant asserts to the effect that there is no intention to make a false report by misunderstanding that he/she has made a false report by misunderstanding that he/she has stolen goods from E convenience points.

However, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, ① convenience point employees did not seem to have engaged in the same act as the theft of objects E, and all of the objects were calculated.

The Edo statement that there was no possibility that the object was entirely stolen at the convenience store, and there was no evidence that there was no evidence that the defendant had a wind to pursue a sobreath of alcohol while there was no evidence.

진술하며 이들 진술에 특별히 허위가 개입되거나 그러한 동기도 보이지 않아 이를 믿을 수 있는 점, ② 반면 피고인은 당시 술에 만취하여 상황을 정확하게 목격한 것도 아니면서 E을 이유 없이 ‘ 부장’ 이라고 하였으며 이 법정에서도 E이 과자 등을 들었다 놨다 하기에 신고 하였다고

In full view of the fact that almost the basis of the report is not clearly explained, the report of this case is false and the defendant has such intention.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is not accepted.

Application of Statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, Article 3(3)2 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and Article 1.6 of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act.