logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.07.20 2016고단3298
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 4, 2016, the defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment by the Ulsan District Court for obstructing the execution of official duties, and on February 12, 2016, the judgment becomes final and conclusive and conclusive on February 12, 2016.

[2016 Highest 3298] The Defendant at around 03:52 on September 1, 2016, at the convenience store operated by the Victim D (M, 46 years of age) located in Yangsan-si, Yangsan-si, the Defendant would not enter the Defendant two times again with the apology.

It is whether the cost interest does not reach the apology by doing so.

씨발 년 아, 먼저 사과하면 나도 사과할 게, 이 똘 갱 아. ”라고 말하면서 피해자를 계속 따라다니고, 편의점 출입문을 주먹으로 친 다음 카운터 위에 놓여 있던 광고 라벨을 몸에 두른 채 밖으로 가지고 나가는 등 방법으로 약 56 분간 소란을 피웠다.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the convenience store business of the victim by force.

【2017 Highest 1292】

1. From around 23:00 on September 11, 2016 to around 23:45 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) purchased the 1 salary class of the victim F (n, 46 years old) in Gyeyang-si, Yangyang-si; (b) purchased the flab in a state of drinking alcohol; and (c) took the flab to the customer who was in possession of the flab after taking the flab on the table within the above convenience store; and (d) tried to take the flab in a state of drinking, she was able to take the flab and flab; and (c) the victim and the victim’s female H, who was the female flab of the victim, tried to take the flab; and (d) took the flab to the effect that the flab was “N flab.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the convenience store business of the victim by force.

2. In around September 11, 2016, the Defendant, at the above convenience store around 23:30 on September 11, 2016, obstructed the business operation of the above convenience store in the same manner as Paragraph 1, and obstructed the business operation of the above convenience store, the Defendant, the victim I (58 years old) who was a customer who was carrying goods at the above convenience store, reported to the police as a interference with the police’s business.

For the reason that the term “F and women” were stated, there is the birth of women F and their children.

arrow