logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2017.05.24 2016구단57147
요양보험급여 결정 취소
Text

1. The Defendant’s disposition to approve industrial accident compensation insurance benefits and medical care benefits against B on March 21, 2016 shall be revoked.

2...

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

가. 당사자의 지위 한일건설 주식회사는 토목건축공사업 등을 영위하는 법인으로 2017. 3. 14. 서울회생법원으로부터 회생절차개시결정을 받았고, 원고는 위 법원으로부터 위 회생회사의 관리인으로 선임되어 이 사건 소송을 수계하였다

(hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiffs” in total for convenience).

Details of the disposition

1) The Plaintiff is the 6th Section of the Construction Works in Daegu Overseas Circulation (hereinafter “instant place of business”).

2) The construction project (hereinafter “instant construction project”)

(2) On November 16, 2015, the Defendant filed an application for medical care approval with the following: (a) around October 9, 2015: (b) around October 15:30, 2015: (c) around October 15:30, 2015: (a) on the part of the instant construction, the Defendant provided work at the instant workplace as a worker who was a new interest company, and (d) provided work at the instant workplace; and (b) around October 15:30, 2015: (a) on the part of the instant construction to the New interest Co., Ltd., Ltd.; (b) on the part of the instant company; (b) on the part of the Defendant; (c) on the part of the instant construction; and (d) on the part of the Plaintiff, the date of the accident was corrected to the date of the accident on October 15, 2015.

(3) On March 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on March 21, 2016, the instant accident alleged by B, “B”, the Defendant: (b) acknowledged the medical care for the instant injury; and (c) issued a disposition that approved the medical care for the instant injury on the left part of the shoulder, “B” on the left part of the well-known shoulder (hereinafter “the instant injury”); and (d) approved the medical care for the instant injury.

4) The Plaintiff filed the instant lawsuit against the instant disposition.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion of this case.

arrow