logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2016.10.19 2015구단2554
요양불승인처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 26, 2008, the Plaintiff became a member of the company “C” in the wife population B (hereinafter “non-party company”) and applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant in relation to the above injury or disease, after being diagnosed on July 22, 2014 as “assumpted by the cross-party speak belt and the power lines, the left-hand speaked speaked speak, the left-hand speaked speaked speak, and the Defendant applied for medical care benefits.

B. The Defendant approved the “satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise satise

C. On October 10, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an administrative litigation with this Court No. 2014Gudan3772 on the foregoing non-approval injury and disease (hereinafter “previous administrative litigation”), but withdrawn the lawsuit on October 21, 2015.

On the other hand, on June 15, 2015, the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant on June 15, 2015, separately from the aforementioned lawsuit, on the ground that “the Plaintiff filed an application for medical care benefits with the Defendant on the ground of damage to the surrounding land and power lines, the left-hand shoulder,” and the Defendant rendered a disposition to grant medical care benefits to the Plaintiff on August 18, 2015, according to the outcome of deliberation by the Occupational Disease Determination Committee that proximate causal relation with the duties of the said branch is not recognized.

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). 【No dispute exists on the ground of recognition, each entry in Gap 4, 5, Eul 1, 4, and 5 (including virtual numbers), and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion is that the non-party company carried out the work that he gets hot timber strings by the power of shoulder and arms a day, and this is a duty that requires a large number of repeated actions and unreasonable force, and the period, daily work hours, and duty performance attitude, etc. of the plaintiff.

arrow