Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal record] On September 29, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon branch on September 29, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 3, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On February 19, 2013, the Defendant forged a private document and the foregoing investigation document: (a) on February 19, 2013, at a “C agency located in the Gu and America-si, the Defendant made it impossible to know the name of D without D’s permission to open one mobile phone in the name of D in order to open the mobile phone under the name of D; (b) on the customer name column of the new contract site for the mobile phone, “D”, “E” in the resident registration number column, “A” in the resident registration number column, “A” in the resident registration number column, “A” in the resident registration number column, and “A” in the applicant column in the date of application, “the applicant column on February 19, 2013” entered “D”, etc., and sent it to an employee whose name could not be known.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged and exercised one copy of the new contract on the KT cell phone in the name of D, a private document on the rights and obligations.

2. On March 25, 2013, the Defendant forged a private document and the foregoing investigation document at the above agency around March 25, 2013, in order to open one mobile phone in the name of D, the Defendant, without D’s permission, required H to enter “D”, “E”, “I”, “I”, and “I” in the contact column in the customer name column of the mobile phone new contract site in the name of D, and to deliver “D” to an employee who is not aware of such fact after signing on the applicant’s name.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged and exercised one copy of the new contract in the name of SKT mobile phone in the name of SKT mobile phone in the name of the private document.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. An investigation report (as to the attachment of documents submitted by a victim);

1. A previous conviction in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, report on investigation (the previous conviction in the same case and confirmation);

1. Relevant Articles of the Act and punishment concerning the facts constituting the crime;