logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.11.24 2017고정1061
위조사문서행사등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 3, 2011, the Defendant: (a) sent a copy of the victim D (36 years old, south) resident number and identification card he/she was aware of at the time he/she was a credit card company employee to the said company by facsimile; and (b) had an employee use the non-fluent employee of the said C shop who is aware of the fact that he/she applied for a new mobile phone purchase as the victim D himself/herself; and (c) re-written the application column for the K mobile phone service with the victim’s name “D”, resident registration number “E” in the victim’s resident registration number column, and in the application column for registration; and (d) had the said employee sign the victim’s name in the applicant column after entering the victim’s name in the applicant column.

Accordingly, the defendant forged the new application for the KT mobile phone in the name of the victim, which is a private document on the new right to subscribe to the mobile phone.

2. On June 3, 2011, the Defendant submitted a forged victim DNA cell phone new application in the name of the victim D to the said company for the use of the forged private document, such as the above “A,” and held the forged private document.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a complaint, an application for membership, a demand note, and a copy of an identity card of the complainant;

1. Relevant Article 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of Article 231 of the Private Document), Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act (the point of exercising the aforementioned investigation document) and the selection of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow