logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2015.11.03 2015고단78
사기등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2015 Highest 78"

1. The Defendant forged private documents, which had operated an original catch store in the name of “C” on the Mansan-si B and the first floor from around October 201 to March 2014, 201.

The Defendant, around November 2013, did not have received a demand from D, a lessor of the above restaurant building to increase the lease deposit from KRW 20 million,00,000,000 from the previous 20,000 to KRW 50,000,000. However, the Defendant had attempted to forge the certificate of the name of D, if D, as the Defendant received the said demand from the lessor, by deceiving E and borrowing KRW 30,000,000 from the lessor, and for this purpose, E lent KRW 30,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00

On November 25, 2013, around 11:30 on November 25, 2013, the Defendant: (a) at the office of a mutual unsound administrative agent in the vicinity of the Changwon District Court located in Changwon-gun District Court located in Changwon-si, Changwon-si, Changwon-si; (b) “A certificate, address, Mucompo-si B, DHPF, and indication of real estate: (c) 1st floor B and 1st floor of Changwon-si;

1. The indication of the above real estate has been owned by the confirmr D and has received the above deposit with the real estate leased in 50,000,000 won to the tenant A for the lease deposit.

2. Ascertainment that, at the time of termination of the Real Estate Lease Agreement with the tenant A, the Claimant promised to pay KRW 30,000,000 among the 50,000,000 to the tenant and the Claimant E under the agreement of the tenant A;

I agree to and confirm that the tenant A, the above confirmation is not subject to objection;

On November 2013, 2013, the confirmation document stating "D" was drawn up, and the seal was affixed to the name of D which was arbitrarily removed from the name of the above D.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a letter of confirmation in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations.

2. On November 25, 2013, the Defendant’s uttering of a falsified document around 12:0.

arrow