1. The instant lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff as the parties is the owner of the land of this case, Dong-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City B road (hereinafter “instant land”), and the Defendant is the management agency managing roads of the Dong-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City.

B. From the point of view of land cadastre 1, 1962, the land category B was divided from the land of Gwangju-dong, Gwangju-gu, about August 6, 1962, and the parcel number of the land of this case was set. Since the land number was set on December 5, 1966, the area was reduced to 212 square meters by dividing D land from the above land B (hereinafter referred to as “the land B B212 square meters”).

) On April 20, 1968, the land category of the land before the instant subdivision was changed to “road”, and on May 13, 197, the area was changed to 701 square meters according to the area conversion registration. 2) Jeonnamdo Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do announced the urban planning decision as to the land of the Dong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City E-gu, including the land before the instant subdivision by the Jeonnam-do Notice No. 96, July 14, 1986.

3) On October 20, 1997, pursuant to the public notice of the determination of the above urban planning on October 20, 1997, the Defendant publicly announced the approval of the implementation plan of the Gwangju Urban Planning Facility (road) with respect to the land of 19 square meters among the land before the instant partition. Accordingly, on December 12, 1997, the land of the said 19 square meters is divided into 19 square meters into F. F. 19 square meters on the land before the instant partition (the Defendant’s portion shall be deemed to be “Dong-gu, Gwangju Metropolitan City, a local government with a legal personality,” which is a local government with a legal personality. However, for convenience, the Defendant shall be collectively referred to as “Defendant” without distinguishing between Defendant and Gwangju Metropolitan City’s “Dong-gu,” and the Defendant shall be referred to as

The present land of this case remains.

However, with respect to the land of this case, the authorization of the implementation plan or the project implementation authorization has not been made until now.