The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

Expenses for appeal shall be borne by the plaintiff.

purport, purport, and.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case, such as the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance, is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as stated in the following two. Thus, this part is cited pursuant to the main sentence of

2. Parts to be dried;

A. The following was added to the fourth 6th 6th 6th 6th : “The Plaintiff filed a petition for review with the Seoul High Court Decision 2013Na26885, but the petition for review was dismissed and dismissed on August 19, 2015 (Seoul High Court 2014Na888) (Seoul High Court 2014Na888), and the Plaintiff filed an appeal against it, but the appeal was dismissed on February 18, 2016 (Supreme Court 2015Da6625) (Supreme Court 2015Da66625)).”

(b) revise the fourth 7 pages “the same shall apply hereinafter to the following unless otherwise specified.”

C. On the 4th 16th 16th e.g., “the Defendants, who were the original acquisitor of the instant building,” were amended to “the Defendants,”

(d) revise “No. 5” of 5 pages 1 to “No. 5” of “No. 5”;

E. From 5th 1, 2th 5th to 5th 5th 5th 5th 3th 3th “in lieu of the payment of the construction cost,” the parts as follows are as follows: Gap’s 1, 4, Gap’s 5-2, 3, 4, Gap’s 6, 7, and 8, witness M, and N’s testimony alone, in lieu of the payment of the construction cost of the building of this case from the defendants.

3. Thus, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is without merit.

The judgment of the court of first instance with the same conclusion is just, and the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants is without merit, and all of the appeals are dismissed.