1. The plaintiff's appeal against the defendants and the plaintiff's conjunctive claim against the defendants added by this court.

1. The reasons for the court’s explanation concerning this case, including the acceptance of the judgment of the court of first instance, are as follows: (a) the pertinent part of the judgment of the court of first instance is used as follows 2; and (b) the Plaintiff’s conjunctive claim against the Defendants added by this court is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (including attached documents) except for the addition of the judgment of the following 3. Therefore, it is acceptable

2. Parts to be dried;

(a) For the following five pages, the Defendant Auction’s 19% of the modified sale amount among the information on the modified sale amount as follows; 52% of the Defendant ABC Auction’s 5% of the 28% of the 28% of the 200s 28% of the 20s 28% of the 20s 28% of the 20s 20

B. From 4th 1st to 4th 1st 4th 2th 2th 2th 2th 2th 4th 4th 4th 1st 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 2th 4th 2th 4th 2th 4th 2th 4th 5th 4th 5th 75,680,000 won (= 75,680,000 x 19%) Defendant Ah 21,190,400 won (i.e. 75,680,000 x 28%) and Defendant Ah 21,353,600 won) to collect the modified auction information without permission.

(c) revise the four pages 3 and 4 "each damages amounting to KRW 75,680,000" as "compensation amount equivalent to each of the above amounts".

D. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as a result of an additional appraiser B’s appraisal before five pages 7:

E. The facts that “A” was modified solely on the basis of the six pages 2 and the descriptions of Gap evidence Nos. 14, 20, 32 are as follows.

(f) revise the 6th 4th 5th 6th 6th 4th 5th c 1 through 3th c. “A”

G. From 6th 12th to 7th 5th 2th 2th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 7th 5th 1st 1st 1st 200 c