1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The appeal cost (including the application cost for the return of provisional payments) shall be borne by the Defendant.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case, such as the quoted of the judgment of the first instance, is as follows 2. The defendant’s assertion in this court and the claim for the return of provisional payment are as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance, except for adding the judgment of the following 3. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Parts to be dried;

(a) To revise “ December 29, 2013” of two pages 7 to “ December 19, 2013”;

B. The part of the 3rd 7rd 7th 7th 7th 3th 9th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e).

(c)a modification of “1,955,237,706 Won” for 3rd 11 parallels to “1,955,237,700 Won”;

D. Each entry of Gap evidence No. 2, Gap evidence No. 8, 11, and 12-1, 2, and Eul evidence No. 2, and the purport of the whole pleadings in witness E's testimony as follows, for the part of the 4th 17th 4th 4th 17th 4th 4th 18th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th 4th

E. From 5th to 5th 5th 5th 5th 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 3rd 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 3th 3th 3th 1st 5th 200 as follows, the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant’s head of the financial team before the instant undertaking to pay business fees according to the orders of the instant construction.