logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 강릉지원 2019.05.14 2019고단331
교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for a period of one year and six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B 24 tons of rawls trucks.

On January 24, 2019, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle at around 20:08, and changed the two lanes from D to E, while driving the two lanes from D to E.

At night, the cargo vehicle operated by the defendant is located in a place with a higher driver's seat than other general vehicles, and it is difficult to confirm it easily by means of a slurbr, in which case the driver is driving on both sides of the cargo vehicle. As above, when changing the vehicle, the driver has a duty of care to operate the direction direction, etc. on the side of the vehicle that the driver intends to change in advance, give prior notice of the change in course, and to operate the steering direction and brake system in a safe manner by accurately operating the steering direction and brake system in comparison with other ordinary vehicles.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and did not work in a direction in advance, but proceeded ahead of the freight of the Defendant, while Gystnael private taxi driven by the Victim F (74 years old) on the two-lanes on the road, the Defendant changed the vehicle line into the two-lanes as it was, due to the negligence of changing the vehicle line into the two-lanes, the lower part of the lower part of the taxi driver’s cargo vehicle into the front part of the lower part of the freight of the Defendant driver’s vehicle. As a result, the taxi turned back to the opposite part of the vehicle in the direction of visibility to the front part of the truck driver’s vehicle. Then, the lower part of the taxi back to the upper part of the truck driver’s vehicle conflicts with the central separation unit of concrete.

At the first-lane, the part of the I car driving in front of the H car, which was followed by the cargo vehicle, was placed in front of the taxi right-hand part.

Ultimately, the Defendant, due to the above occupational negligence, was the victim F at the K Hospital located in Gangseo-si J around 21:23 on the same day, and was the head of the taxi.

arrow