logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2017.02.02 2016고단3456
공용물건손상등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of one million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a partner who works in D, a collaborative company of Hyundai Motor Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "Modern Motor") and is a member of the Korea Metal Trade Union's Modemy-regular subdivisions (hereinafter referred to as "non-regular subdivisions").

On March 15, 2016, Hyundai Motor Vehicle, Hyundai Motor Vehicle sub-councils, etc. consisting of employees of the above in-house sub-councils, have prepared a "special bargaining agreement within in-house sub-councils" to solve the problem of in-house sub-councils, and the above provisional agreement was passed at the general meeting of members of the non-regular sub-councils on March 17, 201.

However, on June 1, 2016, some members of the U.S. branch of a non-regular motor vehicle branch who denied the above agreement wanted to hold an in-house meeting by asserting that the number of non-regular workers is full-time workers at around 6:00 p.m. in the Ulsan Industrial Complex, Ulsan Industrial Complex, and trying to hold an in-house meeting. However, the security personnel belonging to the modern motor vehicle have been pushed out of the company.

On June 1, 2016, the members of the non-regular branch, including the Defendant, carried out physical fighting with the above security personnel who controlled them in the course of entering the modern vehicle in front of the Ulsan Metropolitan Factory, Ulsan Metropolitan Government, in order to hold the intra-company assembly. Police officers such as the Hoju F, etc. belonging to the Ulsan Metropolitan National Police Agency, were employed between the above members and the above security personnel to stop the above physical fighting.

The Defendant assaulted the police officer by keeping the F’s failure in the above date, time, and place of the complaint.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by police officers on the maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal report (including CDs);

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act in relation to facts constituting an offense, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of a fine (the crime committed in the course of demonstration is a contingent crime, and the degree of violence is not strong, and the same.

arrow