A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 27]

1. Around January 7, 2013, the Defendant embezzled borrowed DK7 vehicles equivalent to KRW 36 million at the market price owned by the victim, while obtaining a certificate of personal seal impression and a certificate of personal seal impression from the victim C in the street room in Yongsan-dong, Yongsan-gu, U.S., U.S., the Defendant, around January 7, 201.

On the same day, the Defendant received and sold KRW 10,50,000 to C Co., Ltd. without the consent of the victim while keeping the said vehicle for the victim at the home flus underground parking lot located in the Heung-gu Dong Dong-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.

2. Damage to property;

A. On May 29, 2013, at around 19:00, the Defendant destroyed the Defendant’s house room located in the voice group E of Chungcheongbuk-gun by 700,000, when he/she had a dispute over the victim F and money problems, one cell phone of 4,000, the victim’s market value, which is a large amount of KRW 70,000,000, was damaged.

B. On July 28, 2013, around 19:00, the Defendant: (a) laid one cell phone of the five mobile phones equivalent to KRW 700,000, a victim’s market value on the floor; and (b) destroyed it in front of the Cheongdong Middle School, which was in the territory of the Cheongju-si, due to the issues of divorce with the victim F and divorce.

[2014 Highest 205] On December 12, 2013, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim I that “I want to inherit land equivalent to KRW 700 million at the market price in the voice” within the “H” coffee shop located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu. The cost of land transfer is necessary. If I lend money to be used before, I would sell the land, or receive a loan as security, to repay the land.”

However, the Defendant did not have the land to be inherited at the time and was scheduled to use the money as living expenses even if he borrowed money from the victim, and even if he did not have any property or income and borrowed money from the victim, he did not have any intention or ability to repay it.

Nevertheless, the defendant deceivings the victim as such and belongs to it from the victim, namely, the defendant.