(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.11.28 2013고단3500

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.11.28 2013고단3500

사문서위조등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 22, 2012, from around 23:00 to around 08:00 of the following day, the Defendant, along with B, C, and D, divided into seven parts, using each of the F Real Estate in Guri-si E, and using 52 cards. The number is equal to the same card or pattern, and if all of the cards with continuous numbers are discarded into hand according to the rules, such as dumping into the floor, etc. of the cards with continuous numbers, the number is set in the order of less than the total number of the cards held at that time, 2, etc., 50 won, 1,000 won, and 1,500 won, and 4, etc. are called “huleh”, and 208,000 won were called as “hulhh”.

2. At around 08:40 on November 23, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was arrested and investigated in the act of gambling for the purpose of exercising the right; and (b) was committed to the police officer affiliated with the police box as if the Defendant was the Defendant’s sentence.

Then, the Defendant: (a) made the foregoing I write the form of a written confirmation of the arrest of flagrant offender; (b) made the Defendant write the form of “J” in the name column; (c) made the resident registration number and residence column form “K (53 years old); and (d) signed the form “J” on the side of the confirmed person.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising a certificate, the Defendant forged a letter of arrest of a flagrant offender in the name of J, which is a private document concerning a certificate of fact.

3. The Defendant, at the same time and place as Paragraph 2, exercised the above investigation document by issuing one copy of the certificate of arrest of a flagrant offender under the name of the J, as stipulated in Paragraph 2, to the police officer who was aware of the forgery, as if it were duly constituted.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of B, D, and C;

1. Written statements prepared by the J;

1. Letters of arrest of flagrant offenders and written confirmation;

1. The application of the Acts and subordinate statutes of the seizure protocol and the list of seizure.

유사 판례

-서울중앙지방법원 2012.11.15 2012고단5481

-창원지방법원 통영지원 2014.10.22 2014고단733

-광주지방법원 2015.10.27 2015고단3345

-전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.08.29 2012고단2743

-울산지방법원 2015.08.20 2014고단2823