beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 10,000,000 as well as the annual rate of KRW 5% from June 14, 2017 to October 25, 2017 to the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the cause of claim
A. 1) On December 12, 2009, the Plaintiff completed the marriage report on April 27, 2015 while entering a marriage with C on December 12, 2009, and was actually married. On November 2015, 2015, the Defendant was married. 2) From May 2004, the Defendant was married with C, from May 2004, at the time of the Defendant’s first school year, the Defendant was married with C, and was married two times in one month from May 2008.
3) Around November 2013, the Plaintiff sent a text message received from C’s mobile phone with the Defendant, and around December 2013, the Plaintiff demanded the Defendant to make a phone call to the Defendant to the Defendant and make a phone call to the Defendant and to speak with C. Accordingly, the Defendant continued contact with C, including changing the phone number. On January 2014, 201, the Defendant called C to the Defendant’s working company to the effect that he/she was not married to the Defendant. Since then, C was issued a written marriage certificate and presented it to the Defendant (as seen above, the status of not completing the marriage report up to time was not completed).
(4) The Defendant met with C again on May 19, 2015, and around May 19, 2015, the Plaintiff’s mother sought a marriage certificate between C and the Plaintiff, and demanded to cut off the relationship with C.
Accordingly, the defendant notified C that he will not contact C again, and C continuously approved that he will continue to contact with the plaintiff if he will proceed to divorce with the defendant.
After that, from June 27, 2015 to July 2, 2015, the Defendant maintained a re-related relationship with C, such as taking out overseas travel along with C and locked.
5. In addition, from January 2016, the Defendant avoided C regardless of continuous contact with C from January 2016.
Around January 2017, C was found to be the party's house and requested the defendant to communicate with the letter, and the defendant requested the police to be called up, and thereafter the defendant was moved to another place.
C even on June 9, 2017, a text message was sent to the Defendant to the effect that it would not be hedging, but the Defendant did not answer.