logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2019.04.19 2018가단129876
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 12,00,000 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from August 17, 2018 to April 19, 2019, and April 20, 2019.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff is an unmarried male, and the defendant is the one who is the head of the married female.

B. On April 6, 2018, the Defendant was indicted for violating the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc., Seoul Eastern District Court 2018 Highly No. 15856, and was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million from the same court on the following facts, and became final and conclusive on May 22, 2018.

1) Around June 2017, the Defendant made intimidation to the Plaintiff via a cell phone with the following contents: (a) on the part of the Plaintiff, the Defendant forced the Plaintiff to have only the insurance company working for the Plaintiff by transmitting D text messages from June 5, 2017 to June 22, 2017; (b) on the part of the Plaintiff, C’s D propy photograph and the Plaintiff’s photograph are similar; (c) on the part of the Plaintiff, C leave his husband’s phone with her husband, and C leave her husband’s phone with her husband, and notified her husband of a new workplace, and sent evidence that the relationship with C was cut off.” (b) The Defendant forced the Plaintiff to leave the insurance company for which the Plaintiff works by sending D text messages from June 5, 2017 to June 22, 2017; and (d) forced the Plaintiff to continuously transmit the relationship with C to the insurance solicitor without any obligation to send the text messages to the victim for February 2, 2017.

3) Violation of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Protection, Etc. (the Defendant, such as prohibition of circulation of illegal information, etc.) (the Defendant, by using D text messages from June 5, 2017 to July 5, 2017, intends to kill the Plaintiff.

It is easy to reverse the workplace.

C is simple.

C It is a question of whether to reduce evidence to the husband of the C in the first place.

C는 예전에도 유부남이랑 바람이 나서 회사를 그만뒀다.

D D Elimination of the background photographs of the protruding.

If a telephone is known, it shall be made to C.

D. N. R. P. L.C.

The office should not be applied to the principle of no taxation and the principle of no taxation.

arrow