logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.03.11 2015가단30730
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 10 million and the Plaintiff’s annual rate from April 18, 2015 to March 11, 2016, as follows.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The plaintiff and the non-party C are legally married couple who completed the marriage report on November 30, 1986 and on June 14, 1988, and have a son D (2000) under the slur.

C had committed an unlawful act with another woman even before the delivery with the defendant, as follows, and due to this, the plaintiff and C had a separate living for several years.

B. The plaintiff and the defendant continued to work in the beauty art room operated by the plaintiff around 1995 after the first met around 1989.

C. On September 15, 2010, C and the Defendant were accommodated in the mutual incompeturies E located in Jung-gu, Seoul and became aware of the Plaintiff.

At the time, the plaintiff revoked the complaint against the defendant and C, and received a written statement from the defendant from June 2010 to September 15, 2010, stating that "the plaintiff will not access or make a telephone call to C, and if violated, he would pay consolation money claimed by the plaintiff."

Even after that, C and the defendant continued to exist, and the defendant divorced from Non-Party F as of 201, and on January 22, 2015, sent mobile phone text messages to C as follows.

- In the case of the Oiman's World Cup, she was drinking Kim boomed, and she was at the time when she would do so, and she is required to receive the phone.

Tracked to open a house; and

- Telephone liquor tax.

If there is a word, so far as there is a need for contact.

E. On February 16, 2015, the Plaintiff, who discovered text messages with C’s mobile phone, filed the instant lawsuit on February 16, 2015, and maintained a matrimonial relationship with C.

[Grounds for Recognition: Facts without dispute, entry of Gap 1-9 evidence, purport of the whole pleadings]

2. According to the above facts of recognition, it is reasonable to view that the defendant committed an unlawful act, such as having been aware that C had a spouse, with knowledge that C had a spouse, by committing an internal relation with C for a long time.

One side of the married couple.

arrow