logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2015.07.22 2015고단155
절도
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 17, 2014, at around 20:35, the Defendant unilaterally followed the victim E who returned home after drinking alcohol on the front of the “D” road in Jeju City, and then cut off the victim’s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her

Summary of Evidence

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. A E-document;

1. A list of victims, photographs of damaged parts of the victim, map map of the scene of the case, and photographs thereof;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on details of handling 112 Reporting Cases;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act and Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Judgment on the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant does not have the fact that the victim's fingers are fishing.

The defendant asked the victim of "I well-known" that "I will leave the hand room brought by his hand to the defendant, and "I would like to cause national water or drinking," and since there is no place in the restaurant of "G", the victim went to go ahead of it as soon as I want to collect the country from his own, because the victim did not go to the above. The defendant was under the influence of alcohol and the bridge was prevented, and the victim did not go back to the road under the influence of the roadside while the victim stated "I am under the influence of I am."

2. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court of this case, namely, ① the victim, from the investigative agency to the investigation agency to the date of the instant crime and consistently stated the circumstances before and after the instant crime, and ② the victim.

arrow