The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. On July 1, 2018, at around 19:10, the Defendant shown that at the first-story food store located in Jung-gu Seoul, Jung-gu, Seoul, the Defendant should have taken pictures of the Defendant, which female customers run shopping, and the cell phone should be confirmed. As a result, female customers and city expenses were incurred, on the ground that the Defendant prevented the Defendant from depending on the victim D ( South, 30 years old) who is security personnel, the location of which was the security personnel, and, on the ground that the Defendant prevented the Defendant from depending on the female customers, the Defendant was able to dump and sp the flick of the victim’s flick, and “I will prevent the front of

Does such a conclusion bed;

Along with a photograph affixed, the term "hyna" was sounded as "hyna," and assaulted by one hand, such as making the victim's balth, leading about approximately 170 meters to the first floor and leading about 170 meters to the ground floor.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are the crimes falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act.

According to the agreement bound in the trial records, it can be recognized that the victim has withdrawn his/her wish to punish the defendant on October 23, 2018, which was after the institution of the prosecution of this case.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.