1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

(a) The name of the invention claimed in this case (Evidence No. 4, No. 2) 1: The purpose of the Phobar or its inducement for the prevention of caturology 2) international filing date / the date of priority claim / translation / number of application : November 10, 2006 / May 8, 2008 / Claim No. 10-2008-701068 (amended on October 24, 2013) / [1] Claim No. 1] No. 4 of Pubar, Pubar, Pubric acid, or Pubric acid / [2] No. 1 of Pubarsen 2 of Pubarsen 2 of Pubarium / Pubarsen 1 of Pubarium / [3] No. 1 of Pubarsen 2 of Pubarsen / 2 of Pucinium / 3 of Pucat.

B. The method of preventing merger of urinology (Method's prescopiccom in chlor) based on the combination with the eP0482498 A2 of the European Patent Application Gazette published on April 29, 192, published on April 29, 192, is related to the method of preventing merger of urinology (Method's prescopiccom in chlor) by mixing with the EP0482498A2 of the European Patent Application Gazette, which is published on April 29, 192, and its main contents are as shown in [Attachment 2].

C. 1) On December 26, 2012, the examiner of the Korean Intellectual Property Office (hereinafter “Korea Intellectual Property Office”) regarding the Plaintiff’s patent application invention, the Plaintiff’s claim 1, 4, and 6 of the instant patent application invention is identical to the cited invention publicly known prior to the filing of the application, and there is no newness. Claim 2, 3, and 5 may be easily claimed by the cited invention and the U.S. Patent Gazette 2005/0148594, which is publicly known on July 7, 2005.