logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2018.09.17 2018고단1368
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of five months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 14, 2018, the Defendant was indicted by violating the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) at the Seoul Western District Court on May 14, 2018 and is currently in the second trial.

1. On October 28, 2017, at around 23:05, the Defendant interfered with his/her duties: (a) was boarding a D taxi operated by the victim C in front of the Dong community service center located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government; and (b) was standing in the vicinity of the so-gu So-gu So-gu So-gu So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called So-called the “

Chewing . Chewing . The victim expressed his/her bath, and continued to arrive in the ridge, and followed the victim who demanded a taxi fee, she obstructed the victim’s taxi business by force for about 15 minutes.

2. On October 28, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties: (a) received a 112 report to the effect that “in front of the Goyang-gu Goyang-gu Goyang-gu Goyang-gu Godong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu, and obstructed the legitimate performance of police officers’ duties by assaulting a police officer in front of the patrol and obstructing him/her from performing his/her duties in relation to police patrol, who was dispatched to the scene after hearing the content of damage from the reported person; and (b) having the Defendant take aboard the patrol vehicle for performing his/her duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police of the F;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports and video CDs (excluding CDs);

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act, Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing duties), and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. On the grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, the suspension of execution of official duties is obstructed by the first crime (Interference with the execution of official duties) (the scope of recommendations).

arrow