The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 300,000.

The above fine shall not be paid by the defendant.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal asserts that the punishment imposed by the lower court (a fine of KRW 500,000) is too unreasonable.

2. 직권판단 검사가 당심에서 공소사실 중 ‘피해자에게 주문한 짬뽕을 주지 않는다며 억지를 부리며’를 ‘피해자 D에게 주문한 짬뽕을 주지 않는다며 억지를 부리며’로 변경하는 내용의 공소장변경 허가신청을 하였고, 이 법원이 이를 허가함으로써 심판대상이 변경되었으므로, 원심판결은 더 이상 유지될 수 없게 되었다.

3. The judgment of the court below is reversed pursuant to Article 364 (2) of the Criminal Procedure Act without examining the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing, on the grounds of ex officio reversal as above, and the judgment below is reversed, and the following is again decided

[다시 쓰는 판결] 범죄사실 및 증거의 요지 이 법원이 인정하는 범죄사실과 그에 대한 증거의 요지는, 원심판결의 범죄사실 중 ‘피해자에게 주문한 짬뽕을 주지 않는다며 억지를 부리며’를 ‘피해자 D에게 주문한 짬뽕을 주지 않는다며 억지를 부리며’로 변경하는 이외에 원심판결의 각 해당란 기재와 같다

(Article 369 of the Criminal Procedure Act). Application of law

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

2. Article 70 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act.

3. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for sentencing order under Article 334(1) reflects the Defendant’s acknowledgement of and mistake in the instant crime, and around June 200, there is no record of criminal punishment other than punishment of a fine of KRW 300,00 as a crime of fraud, and the fact that the victim has reached an agreement with the victim during the trial and reached an agreement with the victim, etc., taking into account the favorable circumstances in favor of the Defendant, such as the Defendant’s age, character and behavior, environment, motive and background of the crime, means and method of the crime, and circumstances after the