logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.11.19 2015고정1970
사문서위조등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) around 7:00 a.m. on April 20, 2015, the Defendant received 112 of the 11st day from the Croman bank located in Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangseo-gu, Seoul; and (b) requested a voluntary movement from F, a police officer belonging to the Seoul Gangseo Police Station E-gu, Seoul, Seoul, and called for a police officer of the E-gu Seoul, Seoul, Police Station, who called, to be aware of the fact during the period of suspension of performance of official duties

1. Around 7:15 on April 20, 2015, the Defendant: (a) voluntarily fluored in the Seoul Gangseo-gu Seoul Gangseo Police Station E District E District located in H, Gangseo-gu Seoul, Seoul; (b) then, the Defendant entered the name of the said G in the confirmation column using a black pen in the form of voluntary movement agreement issued by the said police officer; (c) forged one copy of the voluntary movement agreement in the name of G, which is a private document regarding the certificate of certification, for the purpose of exercising his/her signature at will; and (d) submitted it to the said police officer who is aware of the forgery.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in the foregoing paragraph 1.1., prepared a written statement on the facts that were found to have been found due to D and alcohol value problems, and entered the name and resident registration number of G in the column of the person who made the statement, entered the name of G at the end of the written statement, and forged one copy of a written statement in the name of G, which is a private document concerning the certification of facts, for the purpose of exercising the signature of G at will following that name, and submitted it to the said police officer who is aware of that forgery.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each of the “opportune written consent” and “written statement” prepared in G’s name and the applicable laws and regulations

1. Relevant Articles 231 and 234 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense. Article 234 (Selection of Fine for Negligence)

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Sentence 3 million won by sentence - a fine of three million won by sentence - a fine of three million won by fine, summary order - a fine of five million won by fine: (1) confessions, (2) details of crimes, and (3) details of crimes;

arrow