logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원강릉지원 2017.08.09 2016가단51688
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

3. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff is a person who was appointed as a professor at B University on April 20, 1982 (hereinafter “B University”) in economics and professor at the Social Science University (hereinafter “B University”).

B. On June 26, 2013, the president of the University B requested a disciplinary committee to take a heavy disciplinary measure against the Plaintiff on the grounds that the Plaintiff continued collective action or dissemination of false facts in opposition to the university restructuring proposal. On August 20, 2013, the disciplinary committee decided to dismiss the Plaintiff, and the president of the University B issued a dismissal disposition against the Plaintiff on August 26, 2013 (hereinafter “instant first disposition”).

C. On September 2, 2013, the Plaintiff dissatisfied with the request and filed a petition review with the Teachers’ Appeal Committee. On November 20, 2013, the Teachers’ Appeal Committee revoked the instant disposition No. 1 on the ground that the Plaintiff’s appointment of four of the six disciplinary members to participate in a resolution on the challenge, on the ground that there is a lack of quorum due to the lack of quorum due to the request of the Chairperson of the Disciplinary Committee, and the Plaintiff’s appointment of four of the six disciplinary members to participate in a resolution on the challenge. However, the Plaintiff’s Appeal Committee revoked the instant disposition No. 1 on the ground that there is a significant defect in the disciplinary procedure.

In accordance with Article 78-3 of the State Public Officials Act on December 11, 2013, the president of the B university requested a disciplinary committee to adopt a resolution again on disciplinary action against the Plaintiff on the grounds that the Plaintiff was subject to the following grounds (including the grounds for disciplinary action at the time of the first disposition of the head of this case). The disciplinary committee decided on February 17, 2014 that the Plaintiff was suspended from office for three months, and on February 18, 2014, the president of the B university has the objection against the Plaintiff on February 18, 2014.

arrow