1. As to the Defendant’s claim for revocation of disciplinary action between the Plaintiff and the Intervenor joining the Defendant on December 27, 2017.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 1, 2003, the Plaintiff, including the parties, was newly appointed as a full-time lecturer with C University Tax Accounting Division operated by the Intervenor joining the Defendant. On September 1, 201, the Plaintiff was appointed as an associate professor on promotion from March 1, 201 to an associate professor in the D Department.

B. Audit and inspection, prior disciplinary action against the Plaintiff, and revocation of prior disciplinary action 1) Cuniversity’s specific audit group were conducted on the part of the Defendant’s Intervenor on July 6, 2016 through July 28, 2016, with high probability of misconduct and remaining irregularities, including the overall management of school affairs, and on other occasions, the audit and inspection was conducted on the part of the Defendant’s Intervenor’s Intervenor’s work status (i.e., occupational status of full-time teachers) and the research paper of former teachers (ii., from 2011 to 2015) for five years. After conducting an audit and inspection, the Defendant requested the Defendant’s Intervenor to take a disciplinary action against the Plaintiff on September 29, 2016. The Defendant’s president requested the Defendant’s Defendant’s disciplinary action against the Plaintiff on October 19, 2016 (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s disciplinary committee”). The Defendant’s disciplinary action against the Plaintiff’s Defendant’s (hereinafter “the Plaintiff’s disciplinary committee”).

On November 30, 2016, the Intervenor’s Intervenor notified the Plaintiff of the above disciplinary action.

3) On December 3, 2017, the Plaintiff filed a petition with the Defendant seeking revocation of the above disciplinary action against the Defendant, and on March 22, 2017, the Defendant rendered a decision to revoke the above disciplinary action for one month of suspension from office on the ground that the Defendant’s Intervenor’s disciplinary action against the Defendant for the first month of suspension from office was not specifically stated. (c) The instant disciplinary action and the Defendant’s decision 1) C University president requested the Defendant’s president to make a resolution on the second disciplinary action against the Plaintiff again on June 5, 2017, and the Defendant’s president was the Disciplinary Committee on June 21, 2017.