logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.05.22 2014나19846
손해배상
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except in cases where the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is rewritten or added as stated in the following 2. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. In addition, the following two pages of the judgment of the first instance shall be added to the third part of the judgment of the first instance:

After the filing of the instant lawsuit, Plaintiff BG transferred, to Plaintiff BG, to Plaintiff BV, to Plaintiff CV, to Plaintiff CV, to Plaintiff DY, to Plaintiff EY, to Plaintiff EY, to Plaintiff ETS, to Plaintiff EW, to Plaintiff EX, and Plaintiff GG, to Plaintiff GH, and Plaintiff GP notified the Defendant of its transfer on December 13, 2013, respectively.

In the instant lawsuit, the said Plaintiffs, the transferor, withdraw from the lawsuit, and the said transferee succeeded to the shares.

(hereinafter referred to as the “Plaintiffs” in combination with the Plaintiffs and the Plaintiff’s Intervenors. Nos. 8 and 6 of the first instance judgment, the following is added and deleted from 7 to 15.

(B) On May 1, 2008, the first day of the instant construction, which was located within the limit of around May 2008, 2008. However, the proximate causal relation is recognized as to the excess of the standard value due to the instant construction works) following the “recontest” of 11th 12th judgment of the first instance court, and adding “the results of the inquiry of the appraiser A on April 23, 2015.”

3. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claim of this case is justified within the scope of the above recognition, and the remaining claims are dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the first instance court is just, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.

arrow