logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2014.07.11 2014노906
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동폭행)
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (a factual error) was present at the instant site, and there was no fact of at all participating in assault.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by evidence duly adopted and examined by the judgment of the court below and the trial court, it is recognized that during the process of punishing the victim and the victim and the victim who sought to prevent this, A has committed violence against the victim by recognizing and using the same opportunity at the same place as the defendant and A.

Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

1) 피해자는 수사기관부터 원심 법정에 이르기까지 일관되게, 피해자가 A과 실랑이를 하고 있던 중 피고인이 들고 있던 가방을 내려놓고 한 손으로는 피해자의 왼손을 잡고 다른 한 손으로는 목을 눌러 꼼짝 못하게 하였다고 구체적으로 진술하고 있다. 2) 당시 현장에 있었던 H도 피고인과 피해자가 몸싸움을 하던 중에, 피고인이 손에 들고 있던 가방을 내려놓고 한 손으로 피해자의 손을 잡고 다른 손으로 피해자의 목을 눌렀다고 진술하여 피해자의 진술과 일치한다

(No. 66 pages of the record of evidence) The fact that H had long time to determine whether a defendant gets a victim's timber in the court of original instance cannot be deemed to have reversed the statement made to an investigative agency.

3) J also stated that the Defendant and the victim stated that they had a franchising of the Defendant’s bags (Evidence No. 27 pages). (Evidence No. 27 pages) Defendant cited the Defendant’s bags, but the Defendant tried to have the Defendant cut off the Defendant’s bank, and the Defendant tried to not have the Defendant cut off, but the two persons’ body did not contact with the Defendant, I’s testimony that the Defendant did not come back.

arrow