A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant modified the business registration certificate of E operated with D to transfer the said E store to SK Telecom.

On May 1, 2015, the Defendant, at the office of the Defendant in Jung-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, set up a business registration certificate without authority, which is an official document issued by the director of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Tax Office as of October 1, 2013, and made it a computer file, and deleted the portion of “foreign one” and “joint business operator D G” as indicated under the grounds for delivery, and printed one copy of the business registration certificate using a printer, which is a public document issued by the director of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Tax Office as of October 1, 2013.

After that, on June 2015, the Defendant prepared a contract to transfer E at the H coffee shop located adjacent to the Jung-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, Jung-gu, Seoul, and submitted the modified business registration certificate to the Scom Telecom employee with no knowledge of the circumstances as if it was duly formed.

In this respect, the defendant altered official documents and exercised altered official documents.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement made to D or I;

1. A complaint;

1. A contract for the transfer or takeover of each right facility;

1. A deposit slip;

1. Lease contract;

1. The partnership agreement;

1. Each letter;

1. Business registration certificate;

1. Each written confirmation;

1. A written notification;

1. Fact-finding certificates;

1. Recording notes;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the head of revoking complaint and written agreement;

1. Articles 225 and 229 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of this case on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is more severe than that of altering official documents.

However, there is no previous difference between the defendant and another holder of the above official document is not punished, and all kinds of sentencing conditions that the defendant is not guilty, such as the age, character and conduct of the defendant and the circumstances after the crime.