Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 9,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud against the victim C;

A. At around 11:00 on May 23, 2008, the Defendant concluded a false statement to the effect that “E” office operated by the victim C in Young-gun, Young-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, would be repaid to the said victim upon receiving the payment from the said victim to the children who borrowed 2.5 million won or more from the Daegu Sung-gu sexual book.”

However, in fact, the defendant did not operate a secondhand shop, and even if he did not borrow money from the victim due to no particular income or property, he did not have any intention or ability to repay the money.

The Defendant, as above, was accused of the victim and was given 2,50,000 won from the victim’s seat.

B. At around 12:00 on May 25, 2008, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that “If the Dong and Dong of H were hospitalized in a Ampha hospital, and if the Dong and Dong of H were to lend three million won, he/she would complete the payment of installment savings as of June 5, 2008.”

However, the defendant did not contain installment savings, and even if he did not borrow money from the victim due to no particular income or assets at the time, he did not have the intent or ability to pay the money.

Around 26:00 of the same year, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, was given three million won in front of the Daegu Citizens' Center in Taegu-gu, Daegu around 12:00 of the same year.

2. Around January 7, 2009, the Defendant, at the victim I’s house located in the Jeonnam-Namnam-gun Court of Justice, concluded that “the Defendant, at the victim I’s house located in the Jeonnam-Namnam-gun, she received and cut snife the snife from the female students located in Seoul, and supplied the knife to the knife box located in the port of distribution, and that “the Defendant, as soon as possible, remitted 500,000 won to the h’s passbook” to the h’s passbook.

However, in fact, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to engage in the used property business and received money from the victim and used it for personal living expenses.

The defendant.