logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2019.05.07 2019고단318
사기
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Fraud against the victim B;

A. On Nov. 1, 2008, the Defendant concluded that the Defendant’s Defendant’s management house located in Sanyang-gu, Sinyang-gu, Sinyang-si, Sinyang-si, that “if south-gu extends to engage in the funeral of a household in Incheon, it is necessary to pay money. It is necessary to lend KRW 2 million to the victim B.”

However, the Defendant was thought to pay the card price with borrowed money, and there was no particular income or property at the time, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have the intention or ability to pay the card price.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained cash 2 million won from the victim in the same place as the borrowed money, and acquired it by fraud.

B. On November 20, 2010, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim B by phone call at the same place, stating that “A person shall be repaid within two months if he/she lends KRW 2 million to the victim B.”

However, the Defendant did not have any particular income or property, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have any intent or ability to repay the money according to the promise.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 2 million won from the victim to the account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

C. The Defendant, around March 21, 201, phone called to the victim B at the same place and maintained the card value, but he/she borrowed KRW 2 million within five days.

The phrase “the phrase was false.”

However, the Defendant did not have any particular income or property, so even if he borrowed money from the victim, he did not have any intent or ability to repay the money according to the promise.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received 2 million won from the victim to the account in the name of the Defendant on the same day.

2. Fraud against victim D;

A. On April 5, 2011, the Defendant calls the victim D at the same place and pays off to the victim D with the word “if the Defendant lends KRW 2 million to him/her, he/she will pay it up to six months.”

arrow