Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On August 28, 2008, the Defendant committed the crime of August 28, 2008, stating that “The Defendant would pay 10,000 won to the victim D money in return for the 900,000 won installment savings every month by paying 30,000 won every day to the Defendant’s “Cki” operated by the Defendant in Chungcheongnam-gun Hong-gun, Hong-gun, Hong-gun.
However, even if the defendant borrows money from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the money.
As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 10 million from the victim’s account in the name of the EF Bank (F).
2. On May 17, 2011, the Defendant of the crime of May 17, 201, at the “H” restaurant operated by the Defendant in Chungcheongnam-gun Hong-gun G, the Defendant concluded that the Defendant borrowed money from the said victim D to lend money to the said victim D. If the Defendant borrowed money, he would have to repay the money in the same way as the money borrowed prior to the lending. The Defendant would receive a loan as security for installment savings if a certain amount is collected based on an installment savings of KRW 600,000,000 per month.”
However, even if the defendant borrows money from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the money.
As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, received KRW 28,330,00 from the victim’s account in the name of the EF Bank (F).
3. On January 19, 2012, the Defendant committed the crime of January 19, 2012, the false statement that “H” restaurant operated by the Defendant in Chungcheongnam-nam Hong-gun G, stating that “A restaurant is operated, and an original experience farm is trying to operate it,” to the said victim D. The Defendant borrowed money out of money for the operation of the Experience farm.”
However, even if the defendant borrows money from the victim, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to pay the money.
The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and is also the defendant against the victim.