logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.04.12 2016고정2674
상해
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. On April 28, 2016, the Defendant was forced to leave the victim C(33 tax, female) and the victim D(45 tax, female) on the ground that the Defendant was forced to leave the victim’s mouth to her his/her his/her mouth, on the ground that he/she did not leave it to the victim C(33 tax, female) and the victim D(45 tax, female) in his/her direction, and became a vision.

The Defendant, on the ground that the Defendant was in dispute with D, committed violence, such as taking the victim’s face as quih, wheeling the victim’s face, and quihing the victim’s face, in response to the above assault, on the ground that the Defendant was in dispute with D, three times of the price of the victim’s hand, and taking the left hand, and continuing to keep the victim C committed an assault against the above assault.

In this way, the Defendant committed both the dogs and tensions to the victim D, which require approximately two weeks of treatment, and the victim C’s salt ties and tensions, and the victim C, which require approximately two weeks of treatment, respectively.

2. In light of the following circumstances, which can be recognized by the records of judgment, the second public trial protocol, which seems consistent with the facts charged in the instant case, includes the witness D’s statement, the police’s statement protocol with D, and each statement in the police interrogation protocol with respect to C, and the remaining evidence submitted by the public prosecutor, are insufficient to recognize the facts charged in the instant case. There is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

① A) The police officer called to the instant site was merely the Defendant’s hand, and did not talk that he was unsatisfing his hand. On May 13, 2016, D told the police officer on the following: “The Defendant, as his hand, laid his hand twice from twice to three times in the first place, and laid down his left hand.”

“The Defendant has made a statement,” and in this Court, “The Defendant does not have a secret on his left hand.”

There is no fact that the left side has been sold.

“.....”

arrow