The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged was around 08:40 on June 16, 2014, the Defendant got the victim D (the age of 41) who was able to walk the said apartment at the time when he was fluored with the care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care of care.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are those falling under Article 266(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 266(2) of the Criminal Act.

According to the records, the victim submitted a letter of withdrawal of complaint to the effect that he does not punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case. Thus, the prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.