A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On January 6, 2018, around 18:25, the Defendant driven a breab while drunk in front of the Southern-gun, the residence of the Defendant, and then parked the breab while driving the brea, the Defendant deemed that the brea was parked, and said that the brea was the victim D’s vehicle, and said that the breab was the victim D’s vehicle.

Therefore, while explaining that the victim is not his own vehicle, the victim can see the defendant's "I am hythly and sathy."

“Along with the fact that the Defendant was a dangerous object in possession of the Defendant, the victim was demoted once to the victim’s head, and the victim got approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. An unfavorable circumstance for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act: A favorable circumstance in which the defendant was punished for 6 months by imprisonment due to a crime of damaging goods for public use in around 2014, and the defendant was punished by a fine for the same kind of crime: The defendant is divided into his/her mistake and the above circumstances, the defendant's character and conduct, and the circumstances after committing the crime, etc., are comprehensively considered to determine the sentence as ordered.