The defendant shall be innocent.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant was driven by F as his employee.

G It is the owner of the freezing tower in the modern five tons and is a corporation operating trucking transport business.

F around 02:30 on March 10, 1997, the GF operated the said vehicle loaded with a freezing engine so as to exceed 1.7 tons out of the stable, even though the KF restricted the passage of vehicles exceeding 10 tons out of the stable, at the GWD's office located in OWD located in OWD.

The Defendant caused F to commit the above-mentioned violations in relation to his duties.

2. The prosecutor of the judgment shall also impose a fine under Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) with respect to the facts charged of this case where the agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in relation to the business of the corporation.

“The part of “” was applied.

In this regard, on October 28, 2010, Constitutional Court rendered a decision of 14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (merger) as unconstitutional and retroactively invalidated.

3. Accordingly, inasmuch as the instant facts charged do not constitute a crime, a judgment of innocence shall be rendered in accordance with the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.