logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.06.19 2017고단3613
도로법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant was driven by F as his employee.

G Treatment 13 tons of car trucks are corporations that carry on trucking transport business as owners.

F On August 14, 1997, at a point 79.1km 79.1km on the old-mam expressway located in Haban-gun, Haban-gun, Haban-gun on the Haban-gun on the 14th day of August 14, 1997, the F operated the said vehicle with frozen fish to exceed 1.1 ton of the stable, although the road management agency restricted the passage of a vehicle exceeding 10 tons during the stable.

The Defendant caused F to commit such a violation with respect to the work of F.

2. The prosecutor of the judgment shall also impose a fine under Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005) with respect to the facts charged of this case where the agent, employee, or other worker of a corporation commits a violation under Article 83 (1) 2 in relation to the business of the corporation.

“The part of “” was applied.

Accordingly, on October 28, 2010, the part corresponding to the above provision of the law was ruled 14, 15, 21, 27, 35, 38, 44, 70 (merger) and was retroactively invalidated.

3. Accordingly, inasmuch as the instant facts charged do not constitute a crime, a judgment of innocence shall be rendered in accordance with the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow