The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On November 30, 2006, a private driver of the defendant's vehicle A, who is charged, has been driving at a point of 403 km in the Gyeongnam-si in the Gyeongnam-si in the Gyeongnam-si in the 403km of the Gyeongnam-si in the Gyeongnam-si in order to preserve the structure of the road and to prevent any danger to traffic, he violated the restriction on the operation of the vehicle of the road management agency in relation to the defendant's business by carrying a scke on the said scke and operating the 48.29 tons in total weight, 11.2 tons in 2 tons in the 2006, thereby violating the restriction on the operation of the vehicle of the road management agency.

2. The former Road Act (amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005 and amended by Act No. 8976 of Mar. 21, 2008) which is a legal provision applicable to the facts charged of this case, where an agent, employee or other worker of a corporation commits a violation provided for in Article 83 (1) 2 in relation to the corporation's business, the corporation shall also be punished by a fine provided for in the corresponding Article.

“The portion was retroactively invalidated in accordance with the Constitutional Court’s decision of unconstitutionality (Supreme Court Order 2008Hun-Ga17 Decided July 30, 2009).

Thus, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, it is decided as per Disposition in accordance with the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act.