A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents is a person who is engaged in driving a Brane car.

On March 8, 2016, the Defendant driven the above vehicle while under the influence of alcohol on March 23:50, and driven the two-lane road in front of the downward distance in Eup/Myeon due to the Gyeonggi-si in the middle of the Gyeonggi-do. The Defendant driven the two-lane road in front of the downward distance in the middle of the university at the large university, one-lane away from the long distance of the hospital in Korea.

At this time, there is a blind-distance intersection where signal lights are installed in the front door, so in such a case, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately operating the steering gear and operating the steering gear and steering system and safely.

Nevertheless, the defendant was driven by the victim C (59) who was waiting for a halogal vehicle due to negligence while he was negligent in driving the vehicle while under the influence of alcohol and was driving the back part of the halogal vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the above victim due to the above occupational negligence, i.e., a hot spring, etc., where there are two main bodies in need of medical treatment for about two weeks.

2. On March 9, 2016, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (e.g., refusal to measure drinking), at a place at the preceding port of around 00:10 on March 9, 2016, the Defendant, upon receiving a report by causing a traffic accident, led the police officers dispatched after being reported, to voluntarily accompany the police officer to theF district located in E in Gyeonggi-si.

At the time, the Defendant driven under the influence of alcohol, such as smelling and walking without normal conditions.

Since there is a reasonable reason to determine a person, G requested a police officer to take a breath test against the defendant three times from March 9, 2016 to March 01:20 on the same day, but the defendant did not comply with the request without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. C.