A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

1. Around 03:00 on August 2, 2014, the Defendant interfered with business, at a “D” restaurant operated by the victim in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, the Defendant: (a) expressed that the Defendant intended to go without paying the value of food; (b) expressed the victim’s desire not to do so; and (c) expressed the victim’s “Is the victim’s desire to go without paying the value of food,” and expressed the table, “Is the instant small branch food, which was on that spot, falls short of the floor; and (d) expressed the customer’s desire to take the name on the side table, and interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force.

2. As the victim E, a police officer, who was called the above restaurant upon receipt of a report on the date, time, place, and 112, demanded the Defendant to present an identification card, the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to “C and customers, who were the police officer, would be flicke, and would be flicke, who would be flicke, and would be flicke, who would be flicker. I have inevitably insulting the victim.”

3. The Defendant laid down the front part of the driver’s seat seat he was seated by G while arresting the Defendant as a flagrant offender at the lower seat of the patrol vehicle in the crime of interference with business, etc. at the time, place, and place indicated in paragraph (1) of this Article, the Defendant laid down the front part of the driver’s seat he was seated by G while leaving the said F Area to the lower seat of the patrol vehicle, such as the crime of interference with business.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with legitimate performance of official duties concerning G 112 reporting cases and arrest of flagrant offenders, which are police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and G;

1. Each statement of C and H;

1. Investigation report (as to listening to a shoter’s telephone statement)

1. Application of field photographs, field CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime.