The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, at around 00:50 on Jan. 16, 2020, received the 112 report (B) stating that the Defendant would sit on the ground floor of the victim, who was called “C,” and asked the contact of the family members, and thereby insulting the victim, “Is the victim, who is the victim, who is the victim, was sexually insulting, i.e., the victim, “Is the victim, who was called for, where the house is located, and going to enter the house,” and asked the contact of the family members, and thereby, “Is the victim, i.e., the victim, who is the victim of the DNA apartment, and the reporter, who was seen earlier.”

2. The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 311 of the Criminal Act, and public prosecution may be instituted only when an accusation is filed under Article 312(1) of the same Act.

However, according to the records, the victim expressed his wish not to punish the defendant after the prosecution of this case was instituted, which constitutes “when the complaint is revoked”.

Therefore, the prosecution against the above facts charged is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 5 of the Criminal Procedure Act.