logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.11.27 2014고합984
뇌물공여등
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for one year, by imprisonment for 10 months, and by a fine of 6 million won, respectively.

Defendant

B above.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Employment Security Act by Defendant A;

A. When the Defendant operates the office of “I” on the first floor of the building located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, the Defendant recruited Chinese people who wish to work in a domestic restaurant in China, along with J, etc., who are human resources shipping business operators in China. The Defendant obtained a visa issuance certificate from the J, etc. and applied for a visa issuance certificate to the competent immigration office, and arranged employment in a domestic restaurant, etc., and received additional KRW 3.5 million per month from the fees paid by Chinese people to J, etc.

Although a person who intends to conduct domestic fee-charging job placement services as above is registered with the Governor of a Special Self-Governing Province, the head of a Si/Gun/Gu having jurisdiction over the location of the principal place of business, the defendant, without registering the defendant, introduced KK recruited in China from China into the Republic of Korea on April 19, 2008, and arranged employment in a restaurant of "L" from that time until November 8, 2008, and arranged employment in a local restaurant to six Chinese people as shown in the annexed crime list 1.

B. The Defendant, while operating an office M&N and the above “I”, recruited Chinese workers who wish to be employed in a domestic restaurant in China, along with the O and J, etc., who wish to obtain a visa issuance certificate from the Chinese people who want to obtain a visa fromO to the competent immigration office, and the Defendant and M&, N, upon obtaining a visa issuance certificate fromO, etc., applied for a visa issuance certificate to the competent immigration office, arranging employment in a domestic restaurant, etc. In return, the Defendant additionally received KRW 5 million per month and one million per Chinese people from among the fees that Chinese people paid toO, etc.

A person who intends to conduct domestic fee-charging job placement services as above shall be the main place of business.

arrow