logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2015.01.14 2014고단5716
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

around September 16, 2014, the Defendant received 120,000 won from the police officer D, etc. belonging to the Suwon-nam Police Station, the police officer who pretended to be a customer, to receive 120,000 won for sexual traffic and provided guidance for sexual traffic, and arranged sexual traffic to take employees of sexual traffic women into the inside, as well as arranging sexual traffic in the middle of June 2014.

9. Until June, 16, sexual traffic was arranged for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A report on internal investigation:

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and the punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 48 (1) 1 of the Criminal Act to be confiscated;

1. The additionally collected amount under Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic: 3,520,000 won (i.e., 88 x 40,000 won x 40,000 won, the amount calculated by subtracting the money that is paid to female employees out of the average income of 100,000 won per day during the business period of 88 days, and the grounds for the defendant's statement) is that the act of arranging sexual traffic, etc. with reasons for sentencing, such as

However, the size, business period, profits obtained by the defendant, age, character and conduct of the defendant, family relationship, etc. of the business of this case including the fact that the defendant is against the defendant and the defendant does not have the same criminal records, etc. shall be determined as per the order.

arrow