A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operates a place of business which is equipped with shower facilities and spawn facilities with the trade name “D” located in Suwon-si C and Two floors, and is equipped with six smuggling and a waiting room in which sexual intercourse can be performed.

No one shall arrange, induce or induce sexual traffic or provide a place for sexual traffic, etc.

Nevertheless, on September 17, 2014, the Defendant: (a) instructed a police officer who pretended to be a customer to receive KRW 120,000 from the police officer to engage in sexual intercourse; (b) arranged sexual intercourse into a smuggling, which is a female sexual traffic in the Thailand, from July 10, 2014 to September 17, 2014; and (c) assisted an unspecified customer to engage in sexual intercourse.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs (such as electric field photographs, inners, shower facilities, booms, red sea areas, etc. stored under the Round);

1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense and the punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The crime of arranging sexual traffic, etc. with reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Probation Criminal Act is an unfavorable circumstance that a woman's sex is commercialized and impairs good morals, thereby undermining the quality of the crime, and that the defendant has a same criminal record.

However, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by considering the size, business period, age, character and conduct of the defendant, family relationship, etc. of the business establishment of this case including the confession and reflect of the crime of this case, the fact that the defendant does not repeat the crime, and the building of this case is leased to another person.