1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant A shall be entitled to KRW 45,723,93 within the scope of property inherited from the network D and 13,352 among them.

1. The following facts of recognition do not conflict between the Parties, or are recognized by the statements in Gap evidence 1 to 5 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence 1:

A. The Plaintiff acquired bonds, such as the entry of the grounds for the claim in attached Form D with respect to D.

B. On November 28, 2013, D succeeded to the deceased’s property by Defendant A, who is the wife of the deceased, 3/7 shares, Defendant B and C’s 2/7 shares. However, the Defendants reported the qualified acceptance of the deceased’s inherited property on February 3, 2014 by the Daegu Family Court Support 2013-Ma331.

2. If so, the Defendants are liable to pay to the Plaintiff the money indicated in the order equivalent to each inheritance share among the net D’s obligations, within the scope of the property inherited from the network D.

3. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is justified.