logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.05.15 2014가단5201899
대여금
Text

1. The Plaintiff within the scope of the property inherited from Nonparty B’s network:

A. Defendant (Appointed Party) A is 22,123.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff acquired bonds, such as the entry of the grounds for the claim in the attached Form, against B.

B. On April 18, 2009, B succeeded to the property of the deceased, Defendant A (Appointed Party), his children, C, and D. However, the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the designated parties reported the qualified acceptance of the deceased’s inherited property on September 8, 2009 by the Daegu District Court Branch Branch Branching 2009Modan192.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 5, purport of the whole pleadings

2. If so, the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties are liable to pay to the Plaintiff the money indicated in the order, which is equivalent to the inheritance share among the net B’s obligations, within the scope of the property inherited from the deceased B.

3. Conclusion, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendants is justified.

arrow