1. The plaintiff

A. As to Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint and several costs of KRW 28,657,00 and KRW 13,915,472, among them:

(b)the network;

1. The following facts of recognition do not conflict between the Parties, or are recognized by each entry in Gap evidence 1 to 6:

A. The Plaintiff acquired the same claim as indicated in the grounds for the claim in the attached Form against Defendant A, Defendant B, and joint and several sureties who are the principal debtor.

B. On May 16, 201, Defendant C and his spouse inherited the property of the deceased. However, the Defendants filed a qualified acceptance report on the inherited property of the deceased on March 26, 2015, under the Daegu Family Court Support 2015-Ma28.

2. If so, Defendant A is the principal debtor, Defendant B is the joint and several surety, and Defendant B is the joint and several surety, and the remaining Defendants are jointly and severally liable to pay the money indicated in the order, which is the amount equivalent to each inheritance share among the net E’s obligations, within the scope of the property inherited from the network E.

3. Conclusion Claim of the Plaintiff