logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.07.20 2016고단2872
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for 10 months and fines for 5,00,000 won, and imprisonment for 8 months and fines for 5,00,000 won, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal records] On September 23, 2015, the Defendants were sentenced to imprisonment for six months with labor for a violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as the Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts (the brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts), and the judgment became final and conclusive on June 8, 2016.

[Criminal facts]

1. On July 2015, the Defendants: (a) leased Nos. 609, 805, 1209, and 1407 of the Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu Officetel Gtel’s Gtel’s 609, 805, 1209, and 1407; (b) Defendant A takes charge of female employees’ employment and overall management of business establishments and online commercial sex acts advertising sites; and (c) Defendant B takes charge of managing female employees’ advertisements together with Defendant D; and (d) E provides male customers with an office that is waiting for female employees by receiving calls from customers; and (e) Party B takes charge of receiving commercial sex acts, providing customer guidance, and providing telephone calls, etc.; and (e) instruct female employees to teach female employees as a room.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with E, F, and D to arrange commercial sex acts for business from July 2015 to August 2015.

2. On September 2015, the Defendants, along with E, took charge of the employment and management of the female employees engaged in sexual traffic with foreign nationality, such as Russia, etc., after renting the International Officetel 503, 508, 1105, and 1506 in the Seocho-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Gangnam-gu, the Defendants: (a) shared the role of having them take charge of guiding male customers as an officetel by obtaining a pre-contract call from customers, as in the preceding paragraph; and (b) led them to sexual intercourse by guiding them to a room where female employees are waiting.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired with E to arrange sexual traffic for business from September 2015 to October 11, 2015.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Defendant ..

arrow